Skip to content
Calm Business News

Donald Trump's Framework of Retribution and Reward

Trump's voracious urge for payback has rapidly morphed into a methodical system. Over the year since his election, the leader's anger and whims have adopted the guise of government actions in a manner reminiscent to past authoritarian systems. Justice department figures who do not cooperate are summarily removed and replaced by devotees. Opposing figures who question him encounter indictment, trial and punishment. Opponents have been designated under presidential memoranda as “unpatriotic”, “anti-Christian” and “anti-capitalist”, and threatened with criminal charges as “extremists”.

The Justice System Transformed

Every case involving legal action of critics and protection for loyalists exhibits its own unique qualities. Yet, notwithstanding their individual character, they exemplify manifestations of what has developed as a deliberate technique. These events are far from isolated. The administration's cleansing of federal prosecutors and law enforcement personnel, alongside his placement of loyalists in high-level roles, commenced rapidly, quickly took on a pattern, and has now been formed into a structure. Federal prosecutors and the law enforcement agency have been transformed into partisan bodies under Trump's direct orders to carry out his wishes. Wrongdoing has been turned into normal. This is the system of punishment.

Leadership is more concerned with punishing the President's alleged adversaries than they are with protecting our national security.

Inside the Structure

The foundation of this system has been revealed in the court filing of three previous top FBI executives lodged in September in the federal court in Washington against top official Kash Patel and attorney general another official for illegal termination in “a initiative of retribution against the officials for what administration figures deemed to be a failure to exhibit proper devotion”. According to the filing that a former acting director, the former acting FBI director, details a discussion in which he “publicly confessed the impropriety of his behavior”.

He had sought to defend FBI agents from being terminated, the lawsuit claims. Patel informed him that “administration officials” – perceived by the official to be the executive branch and DoJ – had directed him to fire all those who they determined as having been involved in a criminal investigation against him. The complaint goes on: “He stated that he had to fire the personnel his superiors told him to dismiss, because his ability to keep his own role relied on the ouster of the agents who were involved in matters involving the chief executive. Patel commented that there was no option he or Driscoll could do to stop these or any other dismissals, because ‘the agency attempted to incarcerate the President in jail and he remembers.’” Once he advised him he was disregarding the agency's own policies, Patel allegedly said “he understood that and he knew the nature of the swift terminations were likely unlawful”.

Extensive Impact

Following Patel's reported confession to the official, the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau have been weakened and reorganized for Trump's retribution system. Multiple of the agency's senior executives were dismissed or forced out in the early weeks of the government. About numerous legal professionals at the justice department have agreed to a “voluntary departure plan”. A minimum of several federal prosecutors, among them those in the New York office, resigned in dissent over what they viewed as partisan influence in withdrawing the corruption case against the New York City mayor, Eric Adams, in exchange for his cooperation with his federal agency detentions of immigrants. The ethics division of the justice department, which oversees corruption cases, has been diminished to minimal staff. The civil rights division has been devastated: the majority of its personnel has resigned. 33% of senior leaders at DoJ have quit. The unit implementing environmental law has lost a majority its management.

Rewards and Sanctions

Concerning the mayor's situation, the temporary lawyer for the NY office, Danielle Sassoon, resigned in protest against what she labeled as the “exchange”. Tom Homan, Trump's “border czar,” was present as the agent with the mayor on a media outlet to state: “Should he fail to deliver, I will return in New York City.”. And, another figure, previously the senior DoJ official and a ex-lawyer, who brokered the agreement, was granted an appellate federal judgeship, a potential stepping stone to the highest court.

His immunity for wrongdoings perpetrated while in office, awarded by the unprecedented ruling of the conservative on the highest court, thus thwarting his legal action over the Capitol riot and preserving his political viability for the 2024 election, is the cornerstone on which he relies to protect his stalwarts. Under these circumstances, he has been freed to authorize wrongdoing. The effect of the judicial ruling saturates his government and the Republican Party down to its bones. The legal case has escalated. As Richard Nixon's administration lawyer John Dean remarked about the Watergate

EC
Written by

Eric Craig

Luna van de Berg is a Dutch journalist specializing in mindful business practices and sustainable entrepreneurship.

Calm Business News

Type to search articles.